Search
Close this search box.

Changes in Social Security Claiming Strategies Arrive Next Month

Print Article

MARCH 14, 2016 VOLUME 23 NUMBER 10

Our good friend Amos Goodall, a nationally-known elder law attorney in State College, Pennsylvania, wrote our newsletter for this week. Amos explains a particularly confusing and complicated issue.

The Social Security retirement program basically gives back, with some small interest, funds you and your employer have deposited into the system during your working career. There are several strategies which can increase your overall rate of return from the Social Security Administration. Recent changes to the law eliminate two of these, for folks who have not used them before April 29. One of the options ending is called “file and suspend”. The second is called “claim now; claim more later”. It is important to reiterate that the changes are not “grandfathered’, so claimants should consider whether to use these as soon as possible.

Social Security benefits are classically based on a wagearner’s history of compensation, using the highest thirty-five years of employment. The monthly benefit is based on the age of retirement factored into this average. A person who delays retirement until age 70 receives almost double the benefits of someone who files a claim early, at age 62. A chart showing the effect of delayed and early claims for retirement benefits may be found on the Social Security website.

Under current rules, if one member of a married couple has significantly higher earnings than the other, it is possible for the lower-earning of the two to get spousal benefits, which are set at up to half the higher wagearner’s amount. Thus, if on a particular couple’s earning’s record, one spouse had worked steadily in a profession and the other had interrupted her professional development to raise children, the spouse with higher earnings might qualify for $2,000/month benefits, while the other might be limited to $500, based on her earnings record. She may apply for spousal benefits and receive $1,000/month spousal benefits.

There are other situations where a claimant who has had little or no earnings may qualify for benefits based on someone else’s earning record; for example, persons who became disabled while children can qualify for benefits based on their parents’ earnings records. However, an element of these other benefits is that the parent has died or is drawing benefits himself or herself.

What if the higher wagearner is still working and wants to continue until age 70 to qualify for the higher benefit? Under current rules, a strategy called File and Suspend, the higher wagearner of a married couple can file a retirement claim at age 66 and then suspend the benefit. He or she will not be drawing social security, and delayed retirement credits will continue to accrue. Under current rules, if the higher wagearner’s claim has been suspended, the lower wagearner can still file a claim for spousal benefits.

Beginning April 29, if a couple has not already used this strategy, the right to do so will be lost. Under the new rules, with some limited exceptions, spouses and dependents cannot claim benefits if the primary worker has suspended his or her benefit.

One exception allows divorced spouses (who have not remarried) to file claims on their former spouse’s earnings record. Even if the former spouse suspends, the unremarried, divorced former spouse can still move forward with a claim for spousal benefits. This requires the couple to have been married at least ten years before the divorce.

A second strategy, called Claim Now; Claim More Later is also affected by the change. Under this strategy, if a spouse files only for spousal benefits, he or she may continue to work and obtain delayed retirement credits on his or her own earnings record. Then, at age 70, he can retire and obtain enhanced benefits due to a late retirement age. Under the changes effective April 29th, a claim filed is deemed to be requesting both spousal and direct benefits, so as to prevent this strategy.

Social Security benefits are complicated, and there are various retirement strategies available. This article covers only the general situation discussed, and there are other factors which may apply. If you think the old rules might apply, it is important to take action while you still can. Seek qualified professional advice as soon as possible, to beat the April 29 deadline.

Amos Goodall is a partner in the law firm of Goodall & Yurchak. He practices elder law and special needs planning; you can read more about Amos and his firm at the Goodall & Yurchak website, which contains links to a number of articles and resources you might find useful. Thanks, Amos!

3 Responses

  1. Can a 65 year old widow who continues to work (probably until age 70) draw a Social Security benefit from deceased spouse’s earnings (lesser wageearner) and suspend her own?
    Can this be done prior to April 29 but not be effective until September 2016 at age of 66?

    1. Amos Goodall responds:

      My understanding is that a person who is 65 this year reaches full retirement age at age 66. A 65 year old widow who applies before April 29, 2016 should be able to obtain survivor benefits and continue working, but absent other factors (e.g., raising a child, disabled, etc.) will see a reduction in benefits. Please note that this is a specific factual situation, and this response is not intended to be legal advice upon which you can rely. Legal advice can only be given after a face to face meeting at which we discuss all relevant factors which may affect this situation. You should discuss this with counsel or with the Social Security office for a more definitive response.

  2. A new law that will go into effect on April 29, 2016, will phase out this strategy. If you are 62 or older by the end of 2015, you will still be able to choose which benefit you want at your full retirement age. Under the new law, when workers who are not 62 by the end of 2015 apply for spousal benefits, Social Security will assume it is also an application for benefits on the worker’s record. The worker is eligible for the higher benefit, but he or she can’t choose to take just take the spousal benefits and allow his or her own benefits to keep increasing until age 70.

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming

Attorney

Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman

Attorney

Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson

Attorney

Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour

Attorney

Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.