Search
Close this search box.

ABLE Act Passes — We’ll Tell You What It Means

Print Article

DECEMBER 22, 2014 VOLUME 21 NUMBER 46

The Achieving a Better Life Experience Act passed the U.S. Senate last week, and President Obama signed it over that same weekend. But what does it mean for people with disabilities, and for their families? How will you be able to use the accounts authorized by the ABLE Act?

The ABLE Act is loosely connected to Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code. You might recognize that number — the prior law created very popular accounts for prepaid tuition. There is lots of information about 529 Plans, including the popular “Saving for College” website. To better understand ABLE, it might make sense to first describe how 529 plans work.

529 Plans

There are dozens of 529 Plans available. Almost every state has adopted at least one 529 Plan (some states have more than one). They often look very much like mutual funds; you put your money into the account, it is managed by the administrator, and it grows along with the market (or the segment of the market utilized by your particular plan).

You can invest your money in a 529 Plan set up by a state other than yours, or where your prospective student lives. So you might live in Arizona, have a grandchild in Arkansas, decide to invest in Alaska’s plan (it happens to be administered by T Rowe Price), and ultimately use the account to pay for your grandchild’s education in Alabama (just to stay in the “A” states). Not every state’s plan allows out-of-state investments, but most do. There are also “Prepaid Tuition” plans available in many states; they are just what the name implies, though usually the funds can be used for other colleges when the time comes (though there may be incentives to keep the money, and the student, at the predetermined college).

You can set up a 529 Plan for, say, your child — and both sets of grandparents can set up separate accounts for the same student. The multiple plans for a given child can be from different states. The maximum asset limit is set in each plan; if you make more than a $14,000 contribution to a plan for a given student in one year, you may have to file a federal gift tax return (there’s a special rule if you contribute up to $70,000 in one year, but that’s going too deeply into 529 Plans for our purposes).

If you do set up a 529 Plan for a child or grandchild, and that prospective student dies, decides not to go to college, or gets a really good scholarship, you can change the beneficiary of your plan to another family member. You keep pretty impressive control over the plan — and yet it is not considered part of your estate for federal estate tax purposes.

Though you do not get any income tax deduction when you do set up a plan, any later withdrawals for qualified education expenses come out of the plan tax-free. That means that no one has to pay the income tax on the interest and investment income over the years the plan is in place. That’s one of the best parts of a 529 Plan.

ABLE Accounts

The new ABLE Accounts will be similar to 529 Plans in a number of ways, but very different in others. In fact, the ABLE Act creates a new section, right after Section 529, of the tax code. It’s numbered as Section 529A, just to make the connection clearer. Here are some of the highlights of the new Section 529A:

  • A person with a disability can only have an ABLE Account if they were severely disabled by age 26. Why this limitation? It’s mostly about federal budgets; if every person with a disability could open an ABLE Account, the projected cost of the program would mushroom. What does it mean to have a disability before age 26? The easy answer is that someone who was receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI, or SSD) benefits by that age qualifies. Others might qualify, but it will be harder to establish eligibility.
  • Each person with a disability can have just one ABLE Account, and it must be set up in the state where they live. If they move to another state, the account probably will not have to move. But that raises a fairness issue: if the state where the person with a disability resides just doesn’t offer an ABLE Account, he or she will not have the option available.
  • Contributions to an ABLE Account may not exceed $14,000 in a given year. That’s total contributions — if the person with a disability puts in, say, $5,000, then other family members may not contribute more than $9,000. That figure is indexed to the maximum annual gift tax exclusion amount (though gift taxes are mostly irrelevant to ABLE Accounts), so it should go up to $15,000 in a year or two.
  • The maximum size of an ABLE Account will be set by state law. Expect it to be in the range of several hundreds of thousands of dollars. But if the account grows to more than $100,000, the beneficiary will lose Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits — but not state Medicaid eligibility.
  • When the ABLE beneficiary dies, remaining assets in the account go to the state Medicaid program which provided benefits during life (after payment of other pending bills, and limited to the amount the Medicaid program actually paid for the beneficiary’s care).
  • If ABLE Account funds are used to pay for “qualified disability expenses,” there will be no income taxation on the interest or gain in value of the ABLE assets, and the expenditure will not be counted as income to the beneficiary. We don’t yet know exactly what “qualified disability expenses” will mean, as we’ll have to wait for the government to define the term. The law does say, though, that the categories for “qualified” expenditures will include “education, housing, transportation, employment training and support, assistive technology and personal support services, health, prevention and wellness, financial management and administrative services, legal fees, expenses for oversight and monitoring, funeral and burial expenses”.

What does that mean for a given person with a disability (and for his or her family)? Who will be good candidates for ABLE Accounts, and who will not? Should you consider an ABLE Account as an alternative to a special needs trust? Those questions — and more — will be addressed in our newsletter next week. Stay tuned.

5 Responses

  1. CONGRATULATIONS to all those advocates that worked tirelessly to ensure some form of financial relief and personal security is afforded to our Disabled American people. Yes, although not perfect legislation, the age threshold of 26 is a sticky point in dis-allowing full coverage or opportunity to those – – over that lean age – who also struggle with ‘ disabilities’ to have some form of individual financial relief and a minimum of economic security. However this is a great accomplishment in itself within the labyrinth world of political bureaucracy on the federal level that offers to those truly disabled people after years of restrictive and unfair rule-making authority, the human and personal sense of a resemblance of economic independence, although within a genuinely structured system. Although we hope the developing new rule applications – for the A.B.L.E. Act – by the United States Treasury will be promulgated sooner than later, in the interim, we all should join together and look into recent proposals such as the SSI SAVERS ACT and Supplemental Security Income Restoration Act to be re-introduced into Congress with such sound and pronounce momentum for these types of upgrades to existing legislation and rule-making. With such legislative action as the SSI SVERS ACT or SUPPLEMNTAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT being re-introduced into Congress on a strong bi-partisan effort, a simple, needed and well overdue allowance to those Disabled individuals over the age of 26, would actually possess some independent (private) savings – with no reflection on ‘tax expenditures’ or losses to the Treasury – and shed the offensive and oppressive burden of long-term penalties and threats of medical expulsion for simple things as accepting a meal or small donation under the ‘In-Kind Support & Maintenance’ Rule, which upon minimum examination, is quite repulsive to even the average American. Let’s continue the realistic encouragement of the proper modernization of our disability regulatory process and coalesce with such outstanding legislators to bring about a formula that replicates the SSI SAVERS & SSI RESTORATION ACTS in the 114th United States Congress (2015-17).

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming

Attorney

Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman

Attorney

Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson

Attorney

Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour

Attorney

Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.