Close this search box.

Power of Attorney Includes Gifting Authority As “Transfer”

Print Article


George Pittman was a North Carolina resident. He and his wife, Rose Lupton Pittman, lived together on property he had inherited from his family. Mr. and Mrs. Pittman each had a daughter from prior marriages.

In 1988, Mr. Pittman consulted his attorney about what might happen to his property. He expressed concern about the possibility that the home might be taken from his wife if anything happened to him. He specifically indicated that he did not want either his daughter or the government to ever be able to take the home away from his wife.

North Carolina law permitted Mr. Pittman to execute a durable power of attorney, and even provided a form for him to use. His attorney took the statutory form and added one sentence–he included the power to “transfer the real estate known as the homeplace that I inherited from my mother.” With that change, he had Mr. Pittman sign the power of attorney, giving Mrs. Pittman the power to manage his affairs.

Five days after signing the power of attorney, Mr. and Mrs. Pittman met again with Mr. Pittman’s lawyer. This time, he had prepared a deed transferring Mr. Pittman’s interest in the “homeplace” to Mrs. Pittman. With Mr. Pittman present and directing her to sign for him, Mrs. Pittman signed the deed, using her power of attorney as authority.

Mr. Pittman died a year and a half later. Since she had already transferred the home into her own name, Mrs. Pittman did not make any reference to it in the probate proceedings which she filed. Shortly after that, Mrs. Pittman died, leaving her entire estate (including the home she had inherited from her husband) to her own daughter.

Mr. Pittman’s daughter sued, alleging that the transfer of the home into Mrs. Pittman’s name was invalid. She argued that a power of attorney does not permit making of gifts unless there is specific language to that effect. She also argued that Mr. Pittman was already incompetent by the time he signed the power of attorney.

After hearing legal arguments, the trial judge agreed with Mr. Pittman’s daughter and set aside the transfer of the home to Mrs. Pittman. The Court of Appeals agreed, and Mrs. Pittman’s daughter appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court agreed with the general proposition that a power of attorney does not convey authority to make gifts unless it includes specific language to that effect. The North Carolina statutory form power of attorney did not include such language. In this case, however, Mr. Pittman had also given his agent the power to “transfer” the homeplace; the Supreme Court ruled that the power to transfer included the power to do so as a gift. Mrs. Pittman was therefore the owner of the property, and validly left it to her own daughter upon her death. Whitford v. Gaskill, North Carolina Supreme Court, February 10, 1997.

Although Arizona does not have a statutory form for powers of attorney, most readily available versions do not include the power to make gifts. Arizona would likely follow the holdings in North Carolina and other states, and would invalidate gifts made by agents unless the power of attorney included specific authority to make gifts.

In Arizona a gift made without express authority by an agent using a power of attorney may also be grounds for invoking the law governing exploitation of vulnerable adults. Under that law, if the gift is made to the agent (or a close family member of the agent), it may even be possible to recover damages of three times the amount transferred. Such a recovery would depend on the particular facts of a specific case, but it should be clear that use of a form power of attorney, without legal advice, can be a dangerous undertaking.

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming


Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman


Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson


Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour


Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.