Close this search box.

Rich and Famous: Lessons from Steve Bing

Print Article
Lessons of the Rich and Famous

The lives of the rich and famous often provide estate planning lessons for the rest of us. Few provide as many lessons as the short, unhappy life of Steve Bing. Bing, a Hollywood financier, philanthropist, and party boy, died last June at age 55, after jumping from a Los Angeles high-rise apartment. The aftermath may take many, many years to sort out.

Bing never married and left two children, who now have uncertain stakes in their father’s family wealth. Daughter Kira, 21, whose mother is former tennis pro Lisa Bonder, is fighting to have a role in her father’s estate. Son Damian, 18, whose mother is model/actress Elizabeth Hurley, is not as actively involved.

The Bings: Rich and Famous

The Bing family fortune goes back to the 1920s, when Leo Bing hit it big in New York real estate. Leo left  son Peter a significant inheritance. Peter, himself a physician of some renown, and wife Helen had two kids, Mary and Steve. Long before Kira and Damian were born, Peter created six separate irrevocable trusts for future grandchildren, likely to avoid estate tax.

Leo apparently had not created a similarly structured estate plan. Steve Bing inherited $600 million, outright, when he turned 18. He promptly dropped out of Stanford and headed to Hollywood, where he spent freely and invested in winners (Polar Express) and quite a few losers (Beowulf). He gathered writing and producing credits, and became known as a big-time player, also donating significant sums to Democratic candidates and causes. But those close to him knew there was a dark side: drugs and depression.

Bing attempted to disinherit all children he might ever have in a will drafted after he learned of Hurley’s pregnancy: “Whether or not such child is mine, it is my intention not to provide in this Will for such child (or any other child as to which I may be the father) in this Will or for the offspring of any such child or children, whether now living or hereafter born.”

Ongoing Turmoil

Last year, Kira asked about those Bing grandchildren’s trusts. The Trustees, instead of providing a copy, filed a lawsuit to disqualify Kira and Damian as “grandchildren.” The reason: their out-of-wedlock births. It’s true that Steve didn’t help raise either child and didn’t even acknowledge paternity until proved with DNA. But by time the lawsuit was filed, Steve had developed a relationship with his children, and he stepped into the dispute and sided with his kids.

In the lower court, the grandchildren won: “The Trusts contain no conditions, limitations, qualifications, or restrictions on the term ‘grandchild.’ The term, as used in the Trusts, is not reasonably susceptible to any alternate meaning.” The ruling is reportedly on appeal.

Kira, though, is not stopping there. A portion of Steve’s estate, valued at $337,000, is being probated, and Kira wants to be the administrator. The court required that she prove paternity, and a DNA test confirmed her standing. The court also required that the primary beneficiary – The Clinton Foundation – nominate her. She says she wants the job to fight a $7 million lawsuit filed against her dad.

What Can We Learn?

What can the not rich and famous learn from all this? Plenty!

  1. Irrevocable, in most cases, is irrevocable. Trusts, once made irrevocable, can be changed only under very specific circumstances. Deciding you didn’t like what you said decades ago? Not one of them. How could you fix it? Consider a trust protector who has power to adjust to changed circumstances.
  2. Carefully consider control vs. taxes. Tax planning often demands loss of control, as Dr. Bing discovered. How to fix? Be sure to check your comfort level with giving up control before you give assets away just to avoid tax.
  3. Words have meaning. Courts will dig beyond the plain meaning of words only if there’s ambiguity. It’s hard to find ambiguity in a plain word like “grandchild.” How to fix? Again, a trust protector. Or be sure to add conditions, limitations, qualifications. Note, though, that if social norms change dramatically, what you want could be deemed “against public policy” and ineffective.
  4. Words have meaning. Word in a will, like disinheritance provisions, will be followed. Even though Bing and his kids forged bonds well after the will was written, he needed to update the document to bring them back into the fold. How to fix? Review your plan regularly and adjust accordingly.
  5. Youth and wealth don’t always mix. Bing got rich very fast at a very young age. Whether that lead to his tragic end will never be known, but it might have. How to fix that? Reconsider large inheritances. Or leave the inheritance in trust and have a professional trustee manage it.
  6. Lawsuits don’t die. If there’s a lawsuit underway at your death, your estate will have to continue your defense. How to fix? Inheritances left in trust are generally not reachable by creditors of the beneficiary. That might have made the lawsuit less likely to begin with.
  7. Choose back ups. Bing’s estate is in limbo because his named an executor died before he did. How to fix? Name at least one back-up, maybe more if those named are older or the same age as you are. Or, even better, name a professional fiduciary who has a succession plan. (Family members are often not the best choices.)
  8. If you have a trust plan, fund it. Trusts and other entities avoid probate if properly funded and coordinated. The fact that Bing’s probate estate has assets means something wasn’t right. A proceeding likely would be needed for the lawsuit, but that should be it. How to fix? Review your assets and consider what happens to them when you die. If you want to avoid probate, make sure each goes to your trust or other non-probate destination.
  9. Trusts only promote privacy to a point. Privacy is a benefit of having a trust because no documents are filed with a court and become public. But if anyone starts fighting, the plan can become public. How to fix? Build in flexibility and authority with a trust protector or mandatory mediation. Consider confronting issues when your plan can still be changed, and hope for some luck.
  10. No inheritance can ever guarantee success or happiness. And that’s something that can never be fixed.

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming


Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman


Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson


Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour


Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.