Close this search box.

‘I Care a Lot’: Nothing Like Guardianships in Real Life

Print Article
I Care a Lot

Actress Rosamund Pike is having a lot of fun promoting her movie I Care a Lot. But her career bright spot has a dark side. In her speech after winning a Golden Globe for her performance, she half-joked: “Maybe I just have to thank America’s broken legal system for making it possible to make stories like this.” Pike was referring to guardianships, and she had it wrong. The system isn’t broken (at least in Arizona), but it’s also not perfect.

There’s More to the Story

In the movie, Pike plays Marla, a ruthless scammer who preys on elderly people by manipulating the guardianship system in a fictional jurisdiction. That’s one problem with the film. It suggest all states are the same, and they’re not. Each state has its own laws and procedures, some more stringent than others. Those promoting the film say abuse is running rampant nationwide, and a number of news reports just repeat their exaggeration.

But consider: the number of people under guardianship is estimated to be 1.3 million. The filmmakers all point to just one bad apple case: April Parks, a guardian in Nevada who was ultimately sentenced to 16 to 40 years in prison. Parks was indeed awful. But there are thousands of other guardians out there working very hard to provide an important service in our communities.

In Arizona, We Have Licensing

Arizona has what we think is a pretty good system of licensing professionals who serve as guardian and other “fiduciary” roles. A licensed fiduciary (full disclosure: Fleming & Curti is one of them) must follow statutes and regulations, obtain continuing education, respond to complaints, and submit to compliance audits.

Those under guardianship have been deemed legally unable to manage their affairs, and professional fiduciaries or the public fiduciary step in when there is no one else available. The people guardians serve, called “wards” (a term we find unappealing), typically have serious, debilitating conditions: chronic mental illness, severe dementia, serious developmental disabilities or severe, life-altering injuries.

We Also Have Lots of Protections

Because guardianships do strip people of their right to make decisions on their own, the court proceeding to obtain one involves a lot of people and procedure. That’s the biggest problem with I Care a Lot. The movie leaves out most of the procedures that protect people (and the system) from abuse. Of course, if Marla faced obstacles, the movie would have been a lot less entertaining. And a lot longer than an hour and 58 minutes. We get that. But viewers should know, it’s not like that in real life.

In Marla’s story, her scheme gets rolling when a doctor scammer offers up her patient, Jennifer (Dianne Wiest), as a good candidate for guardianship because she is rich and has no family. In real life, the doctor would have to submit a sworn report to the judge. The report describes in detail the alleged incapacitated person’s condition. Doctors have ethical standards, and medical professionals are busy. They don’t have time for such reports and, in our experience, don’t do them unless they believe their patient needs help.

More People and Procedures

If a scammer were able to obtain a convincing doctor’s report, there’s more.

The person who is allegedly incapacitated is entitled to an attorney to represent his or her point of view. If she doesn’t have an attorney, the court appoints one. If the client doesn’t want a guardian, the attorney must present their point of view — even if it’s clear having a guardian is in the person’s best interest. In the movie, Jennifer’s attorney is absent during the entire guardianship process.

In addition, an independent investigator is appointed to report to the judge to make recommendations regarding 1) whether the person needs a fiduciary, and b) whether the person who is asking to be appointed (the “Petitioner”) is the right person. The investigator interviews the Petitioner, family, friends, doctors, caregivers, and more. She then submits a written report of her findings.

Furthermore, the Petitioner must give notice. The spouse, parents, and adult children, and if none, others close to the person get information about the proceeding and can object.

Marla obtains an “emergency” guardianship, which explains some of the abbreviated procedure in the movie. Those can happen in Arizona, too. But they are always temporary and followed by a “permanent” hearing, with all of the procedures above.

Room for Improvement

Is the system perfect? Of course not. All of these protections come at a literal price. All of these people involved are supposed to get paid. That means the process can be very expensive and can deter loved ones who want to help. Many decide they can’t afford it.

Doctors, attorneys, investigators, and judges are busy and human, and they may not always treat every case with the care it deserves.

And being a guardian can be taxing. Many fiduciaries don’t have adequate support or training. There is licensing and continuing education available. But there’s no hands-on fiduciary school where people learn how to do the job on a daily basis.

But We Still Care a Lot

Still, most guardians, and the judges that oversee their work, are committed to their work. They help their wards get better and end the guardianship if they do. And if they don’t get better, guardians do all they can to enhance the quality of life for those they serve. They help people live as independently as possible, ensure they receive proper care, stay safe, and retain as much dignity as possible, both during life and at death.

In real life, most guardians do, genuinely, care a lot.

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming


Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman


Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson


Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour


Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.