Close this search box.

Acting as Fiduciary Can Be Hard, Even Dangerous, Work

Print Article
Acting as fiduciary

When you think about planning your estate, you probably focus on who will receive what share of your property. You might not focus as clearly on choosing your personal representative or trustee. Consider your choices carefully: acting as fiduciary is not so much an honor as it is a chore.

What is a fiduciary?

Lawyers use “fiduciary” as an umbrella term, covering various roles that a person might fill on behalf of another. A personal representative (we used to call them executors) are fiduciaries. So are trustees, agents under a power of attorney — and pretty much anyone who handles another person’s finances or personal decisions.

Sometimes fiduciaries act under informal arrangements. If you help your mother write out checks and pay bills, you might have a fiduciary relationship — even though she never even signed a power of attorney. You could even be a fiduciary based on a family member adding your name to their bank account.

A number of legal obligations follow the “fiduciary” title. Anyone acting as fiduciary must keep good records, protect property from loss, pay attention to the beneficiaries’ interests and provide sufficient and accurate information. There are also things a fiduciary may not do — like self-dealing, or favoring one beneficiary over another.

Is acting as fiduciary really hard work?

It can be. Tax returns (and records) require timely and active management. You may not be great at keeping detailed records on your own finances, but that’s not a choice for your fiduciary work. It is important to get good advice and information from investment managers, accountants, lawyers and other professionals.

It is permissible to get professional help. In fact, it is almost always advisable. Sometimes it is absolutely necessary. But hiring professional help does not remove the fiduciary’s obligation to maintain records and control.

If you take on the fiduciary role, be prepared for a learning experience. Expect to read — a lot. Get better proficiency with numbers (if you’re an accountant, we can assume you’re already ahead of the game on this one). And, if we didn’t make this clear already, keep excellent, detailed records.

But how can it be dangerous?

Family dynamics can often be complex. People who think they have been wronged can be reactive, even explosive. Family relationships that worked while Mom and Dad were alive sometimes break down after death of one or both parents.

Consider Iowa resident Richard Burt, who now has a criminal record. His mother left a will dividing her estate into two equal shares. One was to go to her daughter, Mr. Burt’s sister. The other was to be held in trust for Mr. Burt’s benefit. The sister was named as executor (personal representative) of the estate, as well as trustee of the trust for Mr. Burt.

Mr. Burt and his sister didn’t get along very well, and their mother’s death further strained their relationship. The mother’s house, empty after her death, was right across the street from Mr. Burt’s house. When his sister came over to look at it, and figure out what to do with it, Mr. Burt got very angry.

There was a lot of personal property at the house, much of it belonging to Mr. Burt. He had lived there for some years, and had not transferred everything across the street when he moved out. Although his sister had told him to remove his things so she could get the house sold, he had not taken any steps to do so.

The confrontation escalates

While his sister and her husband stood in front of the house, considering the boarded-up windows and doors without knobs (apparently Mr. Burt had taken it on himself to make those changes), Mr. Burt drove up on the lawn, very fast. He jumped out of his car, started yelling at his sister, kicked her to the ground and threatened to kill her and her husband. They filmed most of the confrontation on her cell phone, but she was very shaken and concerned for her safety.

The executor filed a police report. Officers took photos of her leg, showing what appeared to be Mr. Burt’s footprint. They noted her bruises, and the tire tracks in the lawn. They charged Mr. Burt with four criminal offenses. A jury ultimately found him guilty on all four counts.

Mr. Burt appealed his conviction. He claimed that he had a right to access the house, as a beneficiary of the estate and the trust. The Iowa Court of Appeals disagreed, noting that his sister was acting as fiduciary for his benefit, but that he did not have the right to possess or control the property in his own name.

He also argued that his lawyer had been ineffective. The lawyer should have insisted on introducing a copy of his mother’s will, he thought. Actually, the Court of Appeals ruled, that would have strengthened the case against him, as it would have proved he had no right to be on the property, or to threaten his sister. State v. Burt, April 4, 2018.

What if someone else had been acting as fiduciary?

If Mr. Burt’s mother had named an independent trustee, would Mr. Burt have acted as explosively? Perhaps — but adding the family dynamics to the mix almost certainly increases the possibilities for conflict. Though she presumably trusted her daughter completely, it might not have been her best choice to put her in harm’s way.

That’s really our main point in this discussion. When you select an agent, trustee or personal representative, you should not consider it an honor you are bestowing on a selected child or professional. It is hard work, and can sometimes be dangerous. You have a hard time predicting exactly what the family dynamics will look like after your death; choose your fiduciaries carefully.

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming


Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman


Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson


Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour


Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.