Different Types of Retirement Accounts

Print Article
Different types of retirement accounts

Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), 401(k) and 403(b) accounts. What are the differences among different types of retirement accounts?

Who qualifies for the different types of retirement accounts?

One key difference among different types of retirement accounts is which one is available to you. 401(k) accounts are generally set up by for-profit companies, while 403(b) accounts may be offered by non-profit and government employers.

IRAs are usually thought of as self-established, though there are several ways an employer might set up IRAs for employees. Among those: SIMPLE and SEP IRAs. They are set up by employers but the individual accounts look very much like traditional IRAs.

There are any number of other different types of retirement accounts. Not all of the others qualify for the same favorable tax treatment. And some workers may be eligible for more than one type of account. Finally, of course, a given worker might have a retirement account from a former employer, and therefore have two (or three, or more) different types of retirement accounts.

All of those listed above are “defined contribution” plans. That is, the value and the ultimate payout are determined by the amount contributed and the market forces after investment. There are a whole variety of “defined benefit” plans – they offer benefits based on years of work experience and age of the worker. Defined benefit plans are what most people think of when they hear the word “pension.” These plans are less common today than they had been in earlier decades, though about one in seven workers are still covered by this type of retirement plan.

How are they managed?

Some retirement accounts might be managed by the employer. Others might be out-sourced to a financial entity. Still others might be managed by the individual beneficiary, who can make investment decisions (or hire a financial organization to make decisions for them). Federal rules control how long you have to work before being covered by your employer’s plan. And individual plan managers vary widely.

One of the key concerns for policy makers is how widely workers participate in their retirement plans. Even in the defined-benefit arena, for instance, actual coverage is noticeably lower than the availability of the plans. In 403(b) plans, participation is as low as 80% of eligible workers. But with workers eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan, participation is actually much lower — only about two-thirds of private industry workers even have access to a 401(k) plan, and only about three-quarters of those sign up. That’s one of the key issues addressed in recent federal law changes known as “SECURE 2.0”. Automatic enrollment in the available types of retirement accounts is now favored. Experts hope that participation rates will increase as a result.

The good news: plan participation is trending upwards. The less-good news: even workers very near retirement age (“Baby Boomers,” for instance) have an average of less than $250,000 in retirement savings. The account balances for those in their prime work years are less than $75,000 for “Millenials” and less than $200,000 for “Gen-X”ers.

What are the differences for existing accounts?

But for us — estate planners — the most important differences among different types of retirement accounts are not about setting them up. The important differences are in how distributions are made.

Generally, all the various types of retirement accounts are subject to the same distribution rules. Beginning in the year you turn 73, you have to start taking out annual distributions. Actually, you have to begin taking distributions by April 1 of the next year — but if you wait you will be doubled-up and have to take two years’ worth of distributions in that same year. All of them allow you to make penalty-free withdrawals after you turn 59 1/2. When you die, all of them have similar rules about how your beneficiaries have to take out the funds.

But there are a number of significant differences between the various account types. Key among them are these three:

  1. Required minimum distributions for IRAs can be made directly to charitable beneficiaries and not show up as income on your own income tax return. For most people, this is better than withdrawing the money and then giving it to charity — your charitable deduction may not be worth anything if you don’t itemize on your income tax return. Using the “Qualified Charitable Distribution” you keep the income from ever showing up on your return in the first place. But this is not available for 401(k) or 403(b) holders.
  2. Still working after age 73? You don’t have to take distributions from your 401(k) if you meet basic requirements. But this option is not available for either IRA or 403(b) owners. The key requirement for a 401(k) owner: they can’t own more than 5% of the employer’s business.
  3. OK — this one is about contributions rather than distributions. But for someone still working, and for older workers especially, the contribution limits are important. For 2025, a 401(k) or 403(b) participant can contribute up to $23,000 (plus another $7,500 for those over age 50). For IRA holders, the contribution limits are $7,000 for most workers, and an additional $1,000 for those over age 50.

So which type of retirement account is better?

The choice of retirement account depends more on your employer and available options — at least for most people. But it is also possible to transfer funds among different account types in many cases. In general, most workers will find their 401(k) plan more flexible and the employer’s contributions very attractive. But even someone covered by a 401(k) plan might benefit from having an IRA account — even if it has to be a non-deductible IRA. And that’s a different story.

2 Responses

  1. Thank you for the article. Since it mentioned that 401(k) and 403(b) assets can’t fund QCDs, it should have included that these assets can be rolled over into an IRA so that QCDs can be funded by those assets.

    1. Point taken. You can, in fact, roll your 401(k) or 403(b) account into an IRA and then make Qualified Charitable Distributions from that IRA. But note: if you choose this approach, you’ll need to roll your entire account into the IRA — you can’t just transfer the amount of your minimum distribution to the IRA and then distribute from there. Why not? Because you still have a minimum distribution requirement for anything left in your 401(k) or 403(b).

      This is a good illustration for what we try to accomplish in this newsletter/blog. We want to try to demystify some of the complicated rules and help people see that there are solutions. But if we include all the exceptions, and the exceptions to the exceptions, our articles quickly become too complicated. On the other hand, if we fail to include every variation, someone might not realize that there are additional options they could consider. On balance, we try to stay somewhat simplified (and to keep our articles in the 900-1000 word range to help with that goal). But questions and observations that give us a chance (as here) to expand on our main point are great!

      So thank you, James, for your observation and for the chance for us to elaborate.

      Fleming & Curti, PLC

Stay up to date

Subscribe to our Newsletter to get our takes on some of the situations families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities find themselves in. These posts help guide you in the decision making process and point out helpful tips and nuances to take advantage of. Enter your email below to have our entries sent directly to your inbox!

Robert B. Fleming

After more than 50 years of practice, Robert Fleming will retire on January 1, 2027. Our hearts are full of appreciation for Robert. A founding member of Fleming & Curti, PLC, he leaves behind a legacy built on mentorship, advocacy and education. A champion of autonomy and self-reliance, Robert advocated for thousands of vulnerable children and adults throughout his career. A visionary in the Special Needs Planning and Elder Law communities, his innovative ideas created new opportunities for individuals with special needs. The Fleming & Curti team look forward to celebrating Robert and promoting the legacy he leaves behind in the decades ahead.

If you would like to meet with Robert or learn more about Fleming & Curti, PLC, please contact us at 520-622-0400 or by email: [email protected].

Attorney

Robert Fleming is a Fellow of both the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. He has been certified as a Specialist in Estate and Trust Law by the State Bar of Arizona‘s Board of Legal Specialization, and he is also a Certified Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation. Robert has a long history of involvement in local, state and national organizations. He is most proud of his instrumental involvement in the Special Needs Alliance, the premier national organization for lawyers dealing with special needs trusts and planning.

Robert has two adult children, two young grandchildren and a wife of over fifty years. He is devoted to all of them. He is also very fond of Rosalind Franklin (his office companion corgi), and his homebound cat Muninn. He just likes people, their pets and their stories.

Elizabeth N.R. Friman

Attorney

Elizabeth Noble Rollings Friman is a principal and licensed fiduciary at Fleming & Curti, PLC. Elizabeth enjoys estate planning and helping families navigate trust and probate administrations. She is passionate about the fiduciary work that she performs as a trustee, personal representative, guardian, and conservator. Elizabeth works with CPAs, financial professionals, case managers, and medical providers to tailor solutions to complex family challenges. Elizabeth is often called upon to serve as a neutral party so that families can avoid protracted legal conflict. Elizabeth relies on the expertise of her team at Fleming & Curti, and as the Firm approaches its third decade, she is proud of the culture of care and consideration that the Firm embodies. Finding workable solutions to sensitive and complex family challenges is something that Elizabeth and the Fleming & Curti team do well.

Amy F. Matheson

Attorney

Amy Farrell Matheson has worked as an attorney at Fleming & Curti since 2006. A member of the Southern Arizona Estate Planning Council, she is primarily responsible for estate planning and probate matters.

Amy graduated from Wellesley College with a double major in political science and English. She is an honors graduate of Suffolk University Law School and has been admitted to practice in Arizona, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia.

Prior to joining Fleming & Curti, Amy worked for American Public Television in Boston, and with the international trade group at White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Amy’s husband, Tom, is an astronomer at NOIRLab and the Head of Time Domain Services, whose main project is ANTARES. Sadly, this does not involve actual time travel. Amy’s twin daughters are high school students; Finn, her Irish Red and White Setter, remains a puppy at heart.

Famous people's wills

Matthew M. Mansour

Attorney

Matthew is a law clerk who recently earned his law degree from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. His undergraduate degree is in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Matthew has had a passion for advocacy in the Tucson community since his time as a law student representative in the Workers’ Rights Clinic. He also has worked in both the Pima County Attorney’s Office and the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. He enjoys playing basketball, caring for his cat, and listening to audiobooks narrated by the authors.